Petra Upper MarketGPR showing structurePetra Excavation
 

Abstract and Notes


 

 

Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) Mapping as a method for planning excavation strategies, Petra, Jordan

 


previous section next section

 

GPR Field Methods

View Full TextGPR Equipment

  • A Geophysical Survey Systems Inc. (GSSI) Subsurface Interface Radar (SIR) 2000 system was used to generate and collect the radar data.
    Figure 14
    Figure 14: SIR 2000 System
  • A 400 MHz antenna was used to transmit energy into the ground, receive the reflected pulses, and transmit it to the base station.

View Full TextVelocity Tests

  • Velocity tests are necessary for each site to obtain radar pulse travel times.
    Velocity can then be used to convert travel time to true depth of reflections in the ground.
  • A series of velocity tests were preformed just northwest of GPR Grid 1.
 

Figure 10
Figure 10: Site Showing GPR Grids

  • To perform these tests the 400 MHz antenna was used to collect a short transect over a metal bar that had been inserted at measured depths in the ground.
    Figure 15
    Figure 15: Velocity Test
  • Metal is a perfect radar reflector and is visible on profiles as a distinct hyperbola.
    Figure 16
    Figure 16: Hyperbolic Reflection
  • The initial velocity tests later proved to be inaccurate because the area tested had been exposed in trenches for more than 3 years and the sediment had dried out significantly.  The lack of water made the radar velocities at this location too fast.
  • When those inaccurate velocities were applied to the GPR data, the reflections were calculated to be deeper in the ground than they truly were.

View Full TextGrid 1 Collection and Parameters

  • GPR reflection profiles in Grid 1 were collected with a 50-cm line spacing.  A total of 121 transects were collected in an "L" shaped grid.
    Figure 10
    Figure 10: Site Showing GPR Grids

View Full TextGrid 1 Processing into Amplitude Slice-maps

  • Amplitude slice-maps were generated on a computer to view all significant reflections in the grid.
  • These maps are produced by comparing the reflected wave amplitudes in all the transects within the grids in 25-cm slices.  
    • The highest amplitudes are colored red
    • Areas with little or no amplitude are blue
  • Six individual slices, each 25 cm thick, were produced.  They are shown below, overlaid by the topography of the "Lower Market" area.  Figure 17 is from 0-25 cm depth in the ground and Figure 18 is from 25-50 cm, while each subsequent slice is an additional 25 cm deep.
    • A number of linear walls, buildings and other features are visible at each depth
  • Large areas that are blue are "open" areas, which may be formal gardens between the built features.
    Figure 17
    Figure 17: Slice 1 in Grid 1

Figure 19
Figure 19: Slice 3 in Grid 1

Figure 20
Figure 20: Slice 4 in Grid 1

Figure 21
Figure 21: Slice 5 in Grid 1

Figure 22
Figure 22: Slice 6 in Grid 1

  • An animation of 45 individual slices starting with the ground surface and going to 2.5 meters total depth was created for Grid 1.  Each slice is about 5-6 cm thick and when viewed sequentially the video shows the spatial distribution of features in map view, and with depth.  You can play the video by clicking on the thumbnail image:
    Figure 23
    Figure 23: Grid 1 Animation
  • In Figure 18 shows rectangular structure in the northern portion of the grid.  This building was chosen for more detailed study in Grid 2.

View Full TextGrid 2 Placement, Collection and Acquisition Parameters

  • Grid 2 was collected over the northern structure with 25-cm line spacing and a 20-ns time window for greater resolution.
    Figure 10
    Figure 10: Site Showing GPR Grids

View Full TextGrid 2 Processing into Amplitude Slice-Maps

  • Grid 2 data were processed in the same way as those in Grid 1 to produce a video from the ground surface to 2.5 meters depth.  You may click on the thumbnail image below to see this video:
    Figure 24
    Figure 24: Grid 2 Animation
  • A distinct rectangular structure was imaged, with possible standing columns on the east and west walls and a more solid northern wall.
  • In two-dimensional reflection profiles distinct stratigraphic layers adjacent to the walls were visible, which were hypothesized to be buried garden soils.
    Figure 25
    Figure 25: Reflection Profile Showing Walls and Soil Layers

View Full TextGPR Maps Used as a Basis for Placement of Excavations

  • Slice maps, videos and profiles were used to determine placement of subsurface tests in order to confirm features visible in Grids 1 and 2.
    Figure 26
    Figure 26: Site From South With Trenches
  • Test trenches were placed on the northwest corner of the structure in Grid 2 (Trench 8) and the southeast corner (Trench 6).
  • Figure 27
    Figure 27: Grid 2 Map With Trences 6 and 8

 

previous section next section


 

 
   

______________________________________________________________________
Copyright © 2002. All rights reserved.
Lawrence B. Conyers, University of Denver · lconyers@du.edu · 303.871.2684
Eileen G. Ernenwein, University of Arkansas · eernenw@uark.edu
Leigh-Ann Bedal, University of New York, Erie · lbedal@yahoo.com